Monday, 7 January 2013

Low-Life

I'M A MASSIVE LOW-LIFE . 
Out of all of the bands sleeve's, this is the only one that has any form of the band on it. The expected thing to do would be to use and image of the whole band, or the lead singer . However for New Order, using images of the band was an unusual thing to do. The  reason for this cover  featuring a band member, is because Saville didn't have anything conceptual at the time that he wanted to put forward.   The band weren't  keen on the idea of a photo shoot, therefore they were photographed individually so that none of them would feel self-concious. The photo's were taken with a polaroid film, so that as soon as the pictures were taken the individuals could see them.

I find this cover by Saville the least interesting. To me, it portrays a totally different image for the band and the sound of their music. The monochromatic colour scheme is simple along with the typography too. The thing i find strange about the typography is that the word "new" has not been capitalised. The initial letter is in lower case form. Whereas the second word "order" has been given an uppercase letter. Maybe this pragmatically means that the band are no longer "new".







Sunday, 6 January 2013

Fantin Latour , You cunning little devil.

A Basket Of Roses by Fantin-Latour.


So why was it that Savville chose this still life painting for the band's most famous album to date? He tells The Guardian that " The title seemed Machiavellian" (which means to be cunning) 

The painting is amazing in it's detail . I like how the colours are bright but somehow the painting still looks dark. The flowers in the painting are drooping slightly, this shows lack of life . The grey tones in the picture enhance this. The flowers are painted in pastel shades of pinks and peaches, except from one blood red flower at the back of the bunch. The background colour of greyish brown looks sponged or sprayed. Latour allied himself to the Dutch school. This style of painting is kind of old-fashioned and dated. The paintings are about possesion and reminiscence. 

After a lot of research I finally found that Fantin-Latour preferred to paint imaginative compositions as opposed to still life's.  This evidences the possibility about the truth of the painting. I think that this could most definitely be the "machiavellian" message that Saville is trying to get at. In essence the painting is a blatent lie, we are seduced to believe that the image is a real still life painting, when in fact it isn't. This message would show power, in the sense that the image is so strong we believe that it's real. Corruption between what we believe and lies because the painting is pragmatically a lie. 



Power, Corruption and Lies.

The cover of Power,Corruption and Lies (1983),is another well known (if not the most well known) album by New Order,and it's cover is again by Peter Saville.  It features an amazing still-life painting by french artist Henri Fantin- Latour from 1890 and one of Saville's 'colour codes'. 

               
  Saville explains how his idea  was created and how he thinks the painting fits the title perfectly:

"The title seemed Machiavellian. So I went to the National Gallery looking for a Renaissance portrait of a dark prince. In the end, it was too obvious and I gave up for the day and bought some postcards from the shop. I was with my girlfriend at the time, who saw me holding the postcard of the Fantin-Latour painting of flowers and said " You're not thinking of  that for the cover?" It was a wonderfull idea. Flowers suggested the means by which power, corruption and lies infiltrate our lives." Peter Saville - quoted in the Guardian  29th May 2011

I like Saville's thought process behind this picture however, this is not the only aspect of the sleeve. Again,it is another of Saville's designs which has a colour based code that represents the band's name. The words (the band's name)were not written on the cover itself, (apart from on the North American sleeve), just the assortment of block colour, almost like a foreign language, asking the audience of the cover " what does this mean?".

This element of the cover links to 'Blue Monday', also with a colour based code. The decoder for these codes were featured on the back of this album cover and can this decoder can be used for  " Confusion" and "Blue Monday" singles too.

I like this cover more so than others of Saville's work. The pastel colours of pink , peach and yellow  complement  the darker tones of lilac and blue. Although the colours are painted quite brightly, the image on a whole somehow looks dark. The flowers are drooping which suggests that they are dying and lifeless, the grey tones in the picture enhance this.


According to the Factory website, the cover artwork is reputedly Saville's favourite work for the band. Flowers could link to power , corruption and lies. They are almost seductive which is a way that each of these words could be " power, corruption and lies" could each be described. They are all a little seductive. it also links to this quote from something i posted earlier on ..." The title seemed Machiavellian" (which means to be cunning) 
Also i feel it links to this which is again repeated however links to and earlier post... 


"After a lot of research I finally found that Fantin-Latour preferred to paint imaginative compositions as opposed to still life's.  This evidences the possibility about the truth of the painting. I think that this could most definitely be the "machiavellian" message that Saville is trying to get at. In essence the painting is a blatent lie, we are seduced to believe that the image is a real still life painting, when in fact it isn't. This message would show power, in the sense that the image is so strong we believe that it's real. Corruption between what we believe and lies because the painting is pragmatically a lie." (taken from earlier post)


    As suggested above, he lifted the image of 'Roses' by Henri Fantin-Latour from the National Gallery, however,
"The story goes that when they asked for permission to use the image it was not on the premises but out on loan. Tony Wilson argued that the British taxpayer owned the painting and that he had a right to see it. Amazingly they complied and we were able to see the inspired juxtaposition of the lovely still life oil painting and Saville's colour code denoting the album details."

As mentioned in a previous post, a similar codes was also used for Blue Monday. Saville also devised codes for subsequent covers, namely Confusion and Section 25's FACT 90 From The Hip.